Saturday, August 25, 2012

Tiger Escapes, Kills keeper


@HuffingtonPost: Zoo tiger escapes, kills keeper in Germany http://huff.to/P8lsu3 Shared via TweetCaster

Friday, August 24, 2012

Friday, August 17, 2012

The Bailey Beaver Trap*: Modifications Improve Capture Rate


The Bailey Beaver Trap*: Modifications Improve Capture Rate

With misfires reaching as high as 50%, it is little wonder that the Bailey Beaver Trap* has a dismal reputation (Buech, 1983). Fortunately, Richard Buech discovered several modifications that substantially improved the Bailey’s capture efficiency. This paper explains his findings and offers further suggestions to improve the trap’s capture success. The author believes that the Bailey Trap, when properly modified and used, offers the beaver trapper some excellent advantages over other suitcase style traps.
First, Baileys set completely underwater thereby substantially reducing beaver avoidance of the trap. Second, the trap can be employed in blind (sets without using bait) sets by exploiting normal beaver behavior. Third, the trap uses weaker springs making it safer for the trapper to use.

Suggested Trap Modifications in Order of Importance

Install Modified Trigger Locks

Buech discovered that the standard locks occasionally jam, allowing the trapped beaver to pry the jaws open and escape. This problem generally occurs when the jaws don’t meet with sufficient force or simultaneously at the proper point.
Buech developed a lock that essentially eliminated the jamming problem. He began by flattening out the standard lock and then welding a piece of steel to the end at a forty-five degree angle. This new lock would be reattached to the trap with the original cotter pin. He states that the spring is no longer necessary for the new lock to function properly. The new trap lock’s length from bend to point of weld is 5¾ inches (11.7 cm). The length of the welded piece is about 2 inches (5 cm). Thankfully, Tomahawk Live Trap has started using the improved trap locks.

Shorten & Even Cable Lengths

Since the Bailey has two moving jaws, it is imperative that both jaws fire and meet simultaneously in order to capture the beaver. As stated before, if one jaw doesn’t fire or if both jaws don’t meet synchronously then the beaver will have a greater opportunity to escape. To correct the problem of uneven closing jaws, do the following:
A. Set the trap properly and remove excessive slack in the trigger cables. This modification will reduce the hesitation to the trap’s firing when tripped. Leave a little slack before making final corrections, as you can always shorten the cable further if necessary after testing in step B. As the saying goes, measure twice and cut once.
B. Dry fire the trap to ensure that your changes allow the jaws to meet above the middle of the trap at the same time. Adjust the cable as needed to be sure this occurs.
C. Optional: File down or tape the cable loop tail so that it cannot become snagged on the mesh, thereby preventing the trap jaw from firing.

Center the Cable Wire


How the wire rod should be attached to the trigger’s loop.
The cable wire is normally attached to the ring thereby running the risk of the dog being pulled off kilter. Attach the cable wire to the center of the dog so that it is squarely pulled when the trap fires.

LITERATURE CITED

BUECH, R. 1983. Modification of the Bailey Live Trap for Beaver. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 11 (1):66-68.
INTERNET CENTER FOR WILDLIFE DAMAGE MANAGEMENT.http://icwdm.org
VANTASSEL, S. 1998. Modifying the Bailey Beaver Trap. Wildlife Control Technology Magazine. Sept/Oct:14-16.

About the Author

Stephen M. Vantassel is a certified wildlife control operator who helps individuals, businesses, and agencies resolve wildlife damage issues through training, writing, expert witness, and research. His latest book is the Wildlife Damage Inspection Handbook, 3rd edition. He can be contacted at stephenvantassel at Hotmail dot com.

Thursday, August 16, 2012

WCS Launches New Website has been sent

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Constant Contact" <support@constantcontact.com>
Date: Aug 16, 2012 3:36 PM
Subject: Your email WCS Launches New Website has been sent
To: <ctnwco860@gmail.com>

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here
$Partner.Support_Company_Name
Dear Alan Huot,
 
Your email, named Website Refresh , was sent on 08/16/2012 around 3:36 PM EDT.
 
Below is a copy of the HTML version your contacts received. Don't forget, you can easily monitor the effectiveness of your email with real-time metrics and stats. Log in to your Constant Contact account and visit the Reports area under the Emails tab.
 
 
Subject: WCS Launches New Website
Having trouble viewing this email? Click here
Wildlife Control Supplies News

WCS Launches New Website !!!

Wildlife Control Supplies

We're pleased to announce the launch of our newly designed website!  

 

All the great products and service you expect from us are still available, and we hope the new site will improve your on-line shopping experience.   

 

In addition to a new "look and feel" with streamlined navigation options, we are now offering customers the opportunity to provide product reviews.  We think this will benefit everyone, once we start to collect and post reviews.  As an incentive, we will be conducting a weekly drawing for discount coupons for those who submit reviews which are posted on the site. 

 

Stay tuned for new features - we'll soon be introducing "Live Chat" to give you another way to communicate with us.  Also in the works is a mobile website to provide an optimized interface for cell phone and PDA users.

 

Visit us online at http://www.wildlifecontrolsupplies.com to see for yourself!  If you're having trouble finding your favorite products or if you have any other website feedback, please call us toll-free at 877-684-7262 or email us at admin@wildlifecontrolsupplies.com.

 

 

This email was sent to ctnwco860@gmail.com by ctnwco860@gmail.com |  
Wildlife Control Supplies | P.O. Box 538 | East Granby | CT | 06026
 

Monday, August 13, 2012

Beaver Rabies !!!



Thursday, August 09, 2012

NTA Alert August 2012

HSUS getting taste of its own medicine in court

By JIM MATTHEWS

www.OutdoorNewsService.com

The Humane Society of the United States, an organization that does little to nothing for animal shelters, but sues, badgers and lobbies politicians and businesses into adopting its radical animals rights agenda, is getting a taste of its own medicine.

In a little-reported ruling by a judge in the District of Columbia earlier this month, the HSUS is going to court to face charges under RICO statues on racketeering, obstruction of justice, malicious prosecution and other charges for a lawsuit it brought and lost against Ringling Brothers Circus' parent company Feld Entertainment, Inc.

After winning the case alleging mistreatment of elephants in its circuses brought by Friends of Animals (later merged into HSUS), the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) and the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI), lawyers at Feld filed a countersuit with a litany of charges ranging from bribery to money laundering to racketeering. The attorneys for the animal rights groups asked the judge to dismiss all charges, but most stuck because the evidence was overwhelming. So in early August, HSUS will be facing the music in a case that should attract the attention of hunters, ranchers and farmers, and anyone impacted by HSUS radical animal rights agenda.

While district judge Emmet G. Sullivan did dismiss allegations of mail and wire fraud, but he only did so because Feld didn't have standing to file this charge. His ruling all but set the stage for a class-action RICO lawsuit against HSUS for misrepresenting itself in its fundraising campaigns across the nation. This future lawsuit could easily bankrupt HSUS and put it out of business – and send some of its top executives to prison.

For the first time, a group has fought back against the animal rights and environmental extremists who have been setting policy in this country for the past 20 years or more. Now, instead of getting rich off their lawsuits and fund-raising schemes that misrepresent their efforts and accomplishments, they could be driven out of business when they start getting larger doses of their own medicine. These animal rights groups have cost the farming and ranching industry jobs and raised the price of products we all buy every day. They are behind the efforts to ban sport hunting across the nation. They have forced state wildlife and fishery agencies to waste countless millions of dollars on lawsuits, and they have spearheaded policies and legislation like the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA), which has ruined livelihoods in recreational and commercial fishing without helping marine resources.

These groups operate with surly arrogance, and they believe they are above the law. Thankfully, that is not the case. Stay tuned. I'm sure there will be more to talk about in the near future….




--

Alan A. Huot, President
ahuot@wildlifecontrolsupplies.com
Wildlife Control Supplies

P.O. Box 538
East Granby, CT 06026
860-844-0101   860-413-9831 (FAX)

www.wildlifecontrolsupplies.com
"Products for Professionals"

Follow My Blog: http://wildlifecontrolsupplies.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, August 07, 2012

NTA Convention - 2012 - Owatonna, MN

See a few pictures taken at the NTA Convention held in Owatonna, MN....click here.  I didn't get a chance to walk around that much, hence not many pictures. I'm still waiting for the official gate count but I believe this will be a record breaking event. Next year it is being held in Lima, OH and in 2014 it will be in Escanaba, MI.


Wednesday, August 01, 2012

HSUS getting taste of its own medicine in court

By JIM MATTHEWS
www.OutdoorNewsService.com
The Humane Society of the United States, an organization that does little to nothing for animal shelters, but sues, badgers and lobbies politicians and businesses into adopting its radical animals rights agenda, is getting a taste of its own medicine.
In a little-reported ruling by a judge in the District of Columbia earlier this month, the HSUS is going to court to face charges under RICO statues on racketeering, obstruction of justice, malicious prosecution and other charges for a lawsuit it brought and lost against Ringling Brothers Circus’ parent company Feld Entertainment, Inc.
After winning the case alleging mistreatment of elephants in its circuses brought by Friends of Animals (later merged into HSUS), the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) and the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI), lawyers at Feld filed a countersuit with a litany of charges ranging from bribery to money laundering to racketeering. The attorneys for the animal rights groups asked the judge to dismiss all charges, but most stuck because the evidence was overwhelming. So in early August, HSUS will be facing the music in a case that should attract the attention of hunters, ranchers and farmers, and anyone impacted by HSUS radical animal rights agenda.
While district judge Emmet G. Sullivan did dismiss allegations of mail and wire fraud, but he only did so because Feld didn’t have standing to file this charge. His ruling all but set the stage for a class-action RICO lawsuit against HSUS for misrepresenting itself in its fundraising campaigns across the nation. This future lawsuit could easily bankrupt HSUS and put it out of business – and send some of its top executives to prison.
For the first time, a group has fought back against the animal rights and environmental extremists who have been setting policy in this country for the past 20 years or more. Now, instead of getting rich off their lawsuits and fund-raising schemes that misrepresent their efforts and accomplishments, they could be driven out of business when they start getting larger doses of their own medicine. These animal rights groups have cost the farming and ranching industry jobs and raised the price of products we all buy every day. They are behind the efforts to ban sport hunting across the nation. They have forced state wildlife and fishery agencies to waste countless millions of dollars on lawsuits, and they have spearheaded policies and legislation like the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA), which has ruined livelihoods in recreational and commercial fishing without helping marine resources.
These groups operate with surly arrogance, and they believe they are above the law. Thankfully, that is not the case. Stay tuned. I'm sure there will be more to talk about in the near future….

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Feral Cat Management

@wildlifesociety: New article on the need for feral cat management:... http://fb.me/uclUnlYU Shared via TweetCaster

Sunday, June 10, 2012

110 Stabilizer - Deep Water (38")

The same stabilizer seen in Bob Noonan's mink video, great for the bottom edge sets. Holds the trap securely, easy to retrieve captured mink or muskrats. 110 Stabilizer - Deep Water 

Wednesday, June 06, 2012

Wolf Symposium held in Oregon


All
This message was forwarded to be by Ed Medvetz, MY-T Enterprises:

For those of you that attended the May 12, 2012 Wolf Symposium I think you will support the views listed below.  For those that missed it I hope it is informative.
The plan if for another Symposium in Central Oregon in May of next year.
Thanks to the Chapters in the mid west region and others that supported this symposium.
Joe Ricker
Mid West Director
OHA

Subject: FW: Wolf Symposium Overview
Importance: High

 This from a friend and fellow OHA, SCI member, Dan>
> To all:
>
> Just a follow up note to summarize the information presented at the Oregon Animal Damage Management Council's Wolf Symposium held in Albany on Saturday, May 12th. It was a very well organized and informative meeting with approximately 250 people in attendance. Participants ranged from the anti-hunting groups to ranchers, outfitters, sportsman, hunters, state police, county sheriff, and others from Canada, Alaska, Oregon, Idaho & Montana.
>
> It is hard to relay 8 hours of information in an email that would do just to those dedicated individuals who are attempting to inform Oregonians of the coming storm regarding wolves in Oregon. I will try to relay the most significant and meaningful topics and issues that were discussed.
>
> As far as the individual speakers and their presentations were concerned, I was most impressed by David Allen, the President of RMEF. He is a very down to earth guy who spoke, not from a prepared speech, but rather from his gut. In a nutshell, he stated the following regarding wolves in the lower 48:
>
> 1) They are here.
> 2) They are not going away.
> 3) The future is now.
> 4) They are wildlife just like elk.
> 5) Their primary prey or food preference is elk and each wolf will consume an average of 25 elk per year.
> 6) In 1995, all parties involved in the reintroduction were aware and agreed to there coexistence with other wildlife. However, at that moment and place in time, science and honesty prevailed in the agreements and consensus that the maximum number of wolves would be 15 breeding pairs and 150 total wolves. There is no longer any integrity or respect among the original partners.
> 7) There is no attempt, desire, or intention to control the wolf expansion by the USFWS. The only hope for curbed expansion is for local state control.
> 8) Dr. Davis Mech, Wolf Biologist, estimates in 2008 there were over 2,000 wolves in the tri-state area.
> 9) They expand their numbers by approximately 30% every year.
> 10) They will/can travel up to 43 miles in a 24 hour period looking for a food source.
> 11) The world famous Northern Yellowstone Elk herd numbered 20,000 in 1995. (1 year prior to wolf reintroduction). The winter 2012 count posts a staggering decline with only 4,100 elk left!
> 12) The famous Bitter Roots herd has been reduced over 80% with devastating future consequences of an aging herd with little or no calf and yearling survival.
> 13) The Lolo herd in northern Idaho has been decimated to less than 20% of its 1995 level.
> 14) The once famous moose numbers from Jackson Hole, WY to Butte, MT are gone.
> 15) The next battle is Grizzly bears.
>
> Dr. Val Geist of the University of Calgary had the following to say:
>
> 1) Refusal of American scientists to review the historical knowledge of wolves and why they were eradicated, greatly reduced in many parts of the world in the past may lead to severe disease outbreaks or other catastrophic problems.
> 2) Problem wolves must be immediately discharged to prevent any abnormal human-wolf conflicts.
> 3) France had approximately 3,000 people who indirectly died from wolf related disease and illness.
> 4) The Utopian view of the modern wolf, being a loving social creature who lives only in the deep dark forest, is the result of the Walt Disney movie generation.
> 5) Wolf related disease is currently held in balance due to Alaska and Canada's aggressive predator control measures.
> 6) Wolf scat that is near or in the vicinity of domestic activity raises grave concerns of humans contracting tape worms that can lead to fatal brain cysts.
> 7) Humans have historically been on the menu of wolves.
>
> The ODFW's Directory Roy Elicker had the following to say:
>
> 1) The Oregon wolf plan is the single biggest program in the Department has worked on. I am guessing that means their biggest expenditure item also.
> 2) The wolf budget is currently at $608,000 and is continuing to outgrow funding.
> 3) There are 29 "known" wolves in Oregon.
> 4) Wolves have been spotted in 9 different Northeast Oregon GMU's.
> 5) There are currently 4 established packs: Wenaha Pack, Imnaha Pack, Walla Walla Pack & Snake River Pack with possibly 2 other packs forming in the Minam River area and the Umatilla River area.
> 6) Currently there are no known breeding pairs. The Oregon wolf plan ultimately calls for 14 breeding pairs. This is the alarming part: Without documented 3 year period of established multiple breeding pairs we cannot manage their numbers.
> 7) The Wehana GMU elk numbers are currently 1,800 and way below the MO of 4,250.
> 8) The Wenaha GMU is referred to as the "predator pit" by ODFW personnel.
>
> Mr. Casey Anderson of the Ox Ranch in Idaho had the following to say:
>
> 1) Only 7% or 10% of wolf livestock depredation is documented and/or compensated.
> 2) They have GPS collar data that shows wolf/cattle harassment on a continental and escalating basis.
> 3) One wolf pack had a 210 square mile area that they would roam and patrol.
> 4) Every known wolf needs to be captured & collared to allow 100% tracking and data collection of all wolf expansion & activity.
>
> Mr. Steven Mealey, retired director of Idaho Fish & Game and acting Vice President of the Boone & Crockett Club, had the following to say:
>
> 1) The North American Wildlife Conservation model as we know it is in jeopardy.
> 2) The universities are now graduating biologist with an interest in wolf conservation and expansion and moving from a consumptive to a retention based regulate management style.
> 3) RED FLAGS:
> a) Declining hunter participation
> b) Declining deer & elk populations
> c) Increasing predator population
> d) Overstressed winter ranges
> 4) Two must-do's to protect collapse of the NAWC model:
> a) We must recruit more young hunters.
> b) We must maintain healthy and plentiful ungulate populations to encourage hunter participation.
>
> In conclusion, I am convinced that this is only the beginning of our troubles in Oregon. We already have a top heavy predator problem with just cougars and bears. Throw approximately 250 to 500 wolves in the Northeast corner of the state and we can predict what will happen. One expert was quoted as saying that within 4 to 7 years we will have wolves harassing the elk preserve in Jewell.
>
> For myself in this regard, I will continue to recruit and support youth participation in our hunting heritage and traditions. Also, I intend to write letters to all of our legislators, hunting associations and others to ask for and promote funding to expand the GPS wolf collar program. The closer we monitor these buggers the further and sooner we will be able to push them back. I appreciate your concern in this manner and look forward to future hunting adventures and memories. Please consider joining and/or supporting the following associations who are all working together to continue to provide hunting opportunities in Oregon. OHA, SCI, RMEF, FNAWS, OCA. 

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Urban Fox Conference being held in U.K.


The Urban Fox Conference Friday the 23rd of November 2012

As he debate continues over the urban fox, wrong information is put out into the public domain creating some very mixed messages and understanding.

The Urban Fox Conference 2012 will be held on Friday the 23rd of November 2012 at the Churchgate Hotel, Old Harlow, Harlow, Essex.

The conference will be educational and informative in order to dispel any 'untruths'.

Expert speaker's from leading universities and goverment agencies are lined up to enlighten all.

This conference is directed towards anyone who may come into contact with urban fox related issues such as Environmental Health Officers, Police Wildlife Crime Units, Landowners, Local Authorities etc.

Subjects being debated and discussed will all be urban fox related such as laws, legistlation, risks posed, parasitology, human/pet/livestock interaction etc.

Anyone attending this event, please let us know ??

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Trap-Alert Special Offer

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Alan Huot" <alan.huot@wildlifecontrolsupplies.com>
Date: May 22, 2012 10:01 AM
Subject: Trap-Alert Special Offer
To: <alan.huot@wildlifecontrolsupplies.com>

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here
Wildlife Control Supplies
Trap-Alert™ Special Offer for First Time Buyers!
Greetings!


"Make more money while doing less work...."  We've all heard that before, but what if it were possible?  WCS customers using the Trap-Alert™ system are doing just that and more.  Read below for some Trap-Alert  testimonials from  Wildlife Control Professionals.

For a limited time we are offering 15% off Trap-Alert units and up to two months of free subscription service for first time buyers.    

Kevin Cornwell, CWCP, ACP
Kevin Cornwell of Cornwell's Wildlife Control

Kevin Cornwell, CWCP, ACP of Cornwell's Wildlife Control in Virginia:

"The New Frequency Trap-Alert™ system has changed our business! Our sales closure rate is dramatically higher when we mention an electronic trap monitoring option.   It eliminates the hassle of daily visual trap checks, cutting down on wasteful windshield time. Our job completion time has gone from days to, in some cases, just hours. Imagine starting a squirrel family removal job at 9 or 10AM and then getting an email on the IPhone while you're eating lunch, telling you the job is complete. We did it 11 times last month."

 

Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis of Nukingstreet
Pest and Wildlife Control

Jeff Davis of Nukingstreet Pest and Wildlife Control in Connecticut:

"The first time we used the product was for a raccoon job where it took six days for the raccoon to return to the property and make an attempt to go into the open soffits. Trap-Alert™ saved us from traveling 430 miles to do state required trap checks! We almost paid for one unit with the money saved and earned on the first job! I will be purchasing more units as it will allow me to service more clients without having to hire more employees to just run around and do traps checks! On top of all of that, New Frequency has exceptional customer service!" 

 

If you want to learn more about the Trap-Alert™ system and take advantage of this exclusive offer for first time buyers to obtain up to five units for 15% off the current list price, and up to two free months of service, please contact us at 860-844-0101 or Click Here to learn more!
 

If you want to stay up to date on the latest technology and information updates from New Frequency, the award-winning innovators behind the Trap-Alert™ system, Click Here to stay informed!

Wildlife Control Supplies | P.O. Box 538 | East Granby | CT | 06026

Thursday, May 03, 2012

Raccoon Behavior

Raccoons feed mainly at night. The mere sight of a raccoon out, moving about, during daylight hours does not necessarily constitute a problem.  In the absence of other factors, healthy raccoons can be seen out during daylight hours.

They eat fruit, nuts, berries, small animals and insects, and also will feed on pet food, garbage, and garden crops.

Female raccoons look for den sites in late winter. Litters of one to seven young are born in April and May. Young raccoons open their eyes about three weeks after birth, and often announce their presence with mewing, twittering or crying sounds. They nurse for about six weeks, then leave the den to follow the mother until September or early October when they disperse and establish their own territories.    

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Senator seeks to allow goose kills near NY airport after multiple collisions with planes

Hello,

Too Many Birds in the NY air space

Shared while visiting FoxNews.com:

http://soc.li/IiZbZ4l

The problem of birds living near some of the nation's busiest airports is coming under renewed scrutiny after two emergency landings in a week.






This email is a direct message from a friend who wants to share an item of interest with you.
This email message is powered by Gigya's sharing technology. If you no longer wish to receive messages that are sent via Gigya's service, please click here to remove your email address.
Gigya Inc., 1975 Landings Dr., Mountain View, CA 94043.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Canine Distemper

Canine distemper is a common disease and is usually fatal. Raccoons with distemper act tame or confused, and eventually lose coordination, become unconscious and die. Distemper cannot be transmitted to humans or immunized pets.  The mere sight of an animal, i.e. raccoon or fox,  out during the daytime DOES NOT necessarily mean they are sick in the absence of other factors.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

FTA Convention

Anyone going to the FTA Convention in Evansville,  IN in June  ?

Friday, April 13, 2012

Trapping around People and Pets by Tim Julien


Trapping around People and Pets


What’s changed? Changes in wildlife populations in and around public areas and or are public areas around wildlife. The bridge you have always trapped under for mink and Raccoons now is in sight of two subdivisions, complete with eight-year-old boys and free roaming or temporarily escaped pets.

The landscape has changed and people habits and values are always changing. For sure we know that you have no idea who else is there.

Legal or Right, there is a difference. Even if a method is legal to use the choice to use it is the trappers, as well as the consequences. Yes I can and I have a right to do it will not carry very far in the court of public opinion. Recently 3-20-12, I learned that the latest ploy to ban traps is to demand that Children be kept safe from Traps. There is no documented case anywhere anytime that a child has ever been captured in a foot hold trap, yet the CT legislature thinks it necessary to create laws to protect children for the danger of these traps and therefore they must be banned? Comes down to public opinion, to protect your right to use these tools we must protect them for Public Opinion. Some regulatory agencies understand the need to protect these tools and will stand up to say while others have been beat up so bad over the years that they take the path of least resistance. We need to think about why and where we use devices so that we maintain the choice to use them. Because:

Even if you are Legal you might be Wrong in the Court of Public Opinion. Many unfair regulations have been enacted based on a single event. One emotional accident can cause unfair changes affecting many aspects of wildlife management. Indiscrete drowning of a raccoon has caused a lot of regulatory changes in CT. And the outlawing of bodygrip traps in NE was all about a domestic animal being captured in an illegally set trap…… by an illegally roaming Dog.

How to decide if People or Pets might be exposed to your equipment.
Today’s technologies provide many options, however Personal interviews should not be excluded from your investigations. You must speak to those other than the one doing the hiring; an agenda might cover relevant facts. After you have gathered information, verify it!! That is where technologies come in. Trail cameras are available at all price ranges. Some send the pictures to you VIA text messaging. It pays to delay and evaluate. Google Maps and other software are available free and can be used to provide a very detailed overview of the area around the complainants’ site or potential trapping area.

Farmer says “Sure I need them coyotes gone and there are no pets around my house.” A quick Google map review shows a subdivision of fifty new houses at the far end of his 600 acre property. Safe to set? Sure, but now you have information on where to set and what type of set or trap to use. Reverse the situation and assume the neighborhood called you to help trap Coyotes killing dogs in the neighborhood. Back up out of the neighborhood, seek permission from land owner to set traps on the 600 acre farm away from the other pets to target the offending Coyotes. In the neighborhood you can assume other dogs and pets are free roaming and would limit the types of traps possible to use. Trap on the farm away from the neighborhood and use the most effective traps available for Canine….Footholds. If it is not a possibility, then you can choose to use a species-specific trap such as the Collarum and set in the backyards targeting only canines.

So the main points are to know the attributes of your equipment, i.e. is it species specific and what species might be exposed to the device.
.
Learn How to minimize the real risk and the perceived risk.

Set construction; such as covering a groundhog hole to prevent the entrance of Cats or Dogs and still maintaining the effectiveness of the 220 or 160 you placed in the hole. Cover with a half-bucket or simple sheet of hardware cloth. A very simple cheap way of using effective tools and avoiding domestic animals in downtown suburbia or on the remote trapline.


Capture Specific Targets Animals while avoiding others with:

  1. Set construction.
Considering the physical space and motions of target animal to limit other possible captures. i.e. Set made off the ground will avoid all canines. Traps that are small and very close to attractant will effectively capture Fox and avoid all large domestic Dogs (Labs). Set with a step down (Trench) will be available to canines and avoided by livestock.

b. Equipment available.

Species-specific devices, i.e. Collarum,, Dog Proof traps of varied designs are new and very effective. Learn about them and their uses. Snares are one of the oldest tools available and most misunderstood. Definitions and legal wording of regulations prohibit some of the most advanced tools today. They can be as passive as putting a collar and leash on an animal by the simple action of an animal walking down a path. The animal is restrained by the act of the collar closing from the pressure of its body against the cable. The closing can be stopped at any place on the cable with a stop. As an example a snare can be placed in a trail and the coyote or Dog walks along and its head goes thru the snare and the upper part of its body makes contact with h lower edge of the snare loop and the loop closes. The closure stops at the “stop” or the neck of the animal. Now it is on a leash. If nothing is there to entangle, or jump over, or put continued pressure than the animal is there live, to deal with upon arrival. In a city/urban environment that means a twelve to 24 hour check and release or removal of the animal. In a remote area with no chance of capturing a domestic animal the animal is alive and vulnerable to predation by eagles, Lions, Larger predators. In the rural areas that do not have the risk of non-targets then a lethal snare would be a much more humane option, however back in the city, around People and Pets, a Non Lethal Snare, some times called a cable restraint is an absolute must use. Learn about snares, there components and attributes that make them lethal verses non lethal as the situation calls for..


c. Baits and Lures.

Understand the intended reaction of lures/baits from animals and how this can be used to lessen the attractiveness to others, i.e. sweet lures are less attractive to Canines and still very attractive to other predators like Skunks and Raccoons. If you are targeting an aggressive Coyote in spring, a blended flat set with Gland Lure and coyote urine will be very aggressively be worked by a Coyote. A food lure set (dirt hole) would be a maybe, at best for an aggressive Coyote, however very attractive to Raccoons, so if your target was the Coyote it would be better to use the Gland Lure/Urine combination verses a food lure. Trapping with cages are much more forgiving if a non target is captured, however if you are trapping Raccoons in or near areas that are also frequented by people and pets why not use a newer DP from Duke, a Lil Griz or Dagger and eliminate the chance of capturing a Dog, legal or not.


Please provide your thoughts and ideas that might help share this message to WCO’s and Fur Trappers.

Tim Julien

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Mole FAQs


Now that Mole Season is upon us, here are a few Frequently Asked Questions about moles!
  1. How long do moles live?   Moles may live for up to 7 years, however, more than 85% die in the first 3 years.
  2. What and how much do moles eat?   Moles are opportunistic feeders and consume almost anything they can catch. Earthworms are the main component of their diet, however, insects and mollusks make up the majority of the other prey. Moles usually eat three times a day. An adult consumes about 1/8 pound of food per day.
  3. When are moles most active?   Moles have 3 periods of activity: 2-7 am., 11-4 pm., and 8-ll pm. Times may vary with location and with the time of the year. For example, males are more active in February and March to search for receptive females. On the other hand, females are more active in May and June when they need more food for nursing their young. Moles spend nearly half of their time sleeping.
  4. What is the typical litter size and how many litters will a female have per year?   Litter sizes range from 2-8 with an average of 4. Gestation period is thought to be around 28 days. If conditions are not favorable, the female may reabsorb the embryos she is carrying. Most experts believe that a female may have up to three litters per year.
  5. How do moles communicate?   Smell is very well developed in moles. Both males and females produce glandular secretions that empty into the urinary tract. The amount and composition of these secretions changes during breeding season.
  6. How many different species of moles occur in the US?   There are 7 species of moles. The two most common are the eastern mole (Scalopus aquari-cus) and the star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata). Both occur east of the Rockies.
  7. Can moles swim?   All moles can swim it’the need arises. They have been observed to swim up to an hour and to cover a distance of over a half mile. The star-nosed mole is semi-acquatic and often obtains its food underwater. Members of this species are usually found in low- lying areas near water. In fact, their tunnels may exit into ponds or streams.
  8. How do moles dig?   The front legs are greatly enlarged and point at right angles to the body. While digging, the legs are swept from front to back in a horizontal plane. This power stroke moves the body forward and either dislodges the soil or pushes it outward forming the tunnels. Moles can dig at approx. 18 ft. per hour.
  9. Do moles have different tunnels?   Yes, they usually have two types – surface tunnels and deep tunnels. Surface tunnels have visible, raised portions above the ground. These are particularly common in recently disturbed soils, sandy soils, and in terrains where food is found just below the surface. Surface tunnels are more easily dug but appear to be more temporary, especially when their prey goes deeper in the soil due to drought or cold temperature. Deep tunnels ranging from two inches to five feet are more commonly used. This requires the mole to place mounds of dirt above the surface of the lawn.
  10. Are the number of mounds a good indicator of the number of moles in a given area?   No.
  11. How are moles controlled?   There are several ways of getting rid of moles. These include trapping, poisoning, and using chemicals to eliminate potential food sources such as earthworms and insect grubs from the soil. Most people find the latter two methods unacceptable because they are either too dangerous to use or they have long-term adverse effects on the environment.
  12. What is the best mole trap to use?   The first factor to consider is efficacy. Will the trap catch moles ? A very important second factor is safety. Many traps have dangerous features such as the sharp spears or a device that acts as a strong choker. Because many of these products protrude above ground, they are a potential danger to children and pets. Many operators/consumers are concerned about cost. This is especially true if many traps are needed. Another factor is longevity, basically, will the trap offer several seasons of service ? All of these factors should be considered when choosing a mole trap.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Virginia Legislature Urged to Oppose TNR

On February 27, TWS wrote to members of the Virginia House of Representatives Agriculture Subcommittee in strong opposition of SB 359, which would allow the establishment of trap-neuter-release (TNR) programs in Virginia and exempt program participants of the legal responsibilities of cat ownership. TWS is concerned about the effects of implementing TNR as the accepted method of feral cat control because of the serious harm it poses to native wildlife and potential negative effects on human health. Feral cats are non-native predators that prey on native wildlife and can be a vector for spreading diseases and parasites to human and wildlife populations. On February 8, The Virginia State Senate passed SB 359 but the measure was later rejected by the House after receiving oral and written testimony in opposition to the legislation.